<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Iran Doesn&#8217;t Know How To Use Photoshop</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.synthesis.net/2008/07/10/iran-doesnt-know-how-to-use-photoshop/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.synthesis.net/2008/07/10/iran-doesnt-know-how-to-use-photoshop/</link>
	<description>A music blog with a techy twist, twisted content, and other entertainment oddities viral and live from Northern California.</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 13:59:04 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: BREAKING NEWS: It's All Bullshit &#124; Synthesis Magazine Blog</title>
		<link>http://blog.synthesis.net/2008/07/10/iran-doesnt-know-how-to-use-photoshop/#comment-167896</link>
		<dc:creator>BREAKING NEWS: It's All Bullshit &#124; Synthesis Magazine Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Jul 2008 20:37:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.synthesis.net/?p=8066#comment-167896</guid>
		<description>[...] of it. Iran&#8217;s missiles? not just photoshopped, but made up. Jesse Jackson&#8217;s &#8220;hot mic&#8221;? Not really such an accident. Amazon lost [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] of it. Iran&#8217;s missiles? not just photoshopped, but made up. Jesse Jackson&#8217;s &#8220;hot mic&#8221;? Not really such an accident. Amazon lost [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Maszka</title>
		<link>http://blog.synthesis.net/2008/07/10/iran-doesnt-know-how-to-use-photoshop/#comment-167297</link>
		<dc:creator>John Maszka</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Jul 2008 20:45:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.synthesis.net/?p=8066#comment-167297</guid>
		<description>Photoshop or not... While diplomacy with Iran may have its challenges, it should be pursued at every length. Iran has a conscription army and nearly 10 million eligible males between the ages of 18 and 32 (Posen, 2003).   Iran’s conventional military potential aside, US Intelligence assesses that Iran will likely have nuclear weapons capability within the decade (Select Committee on Intelligence, 2006). 

The United States needs to be very aware of Iran’s growing political influence in the international community as well.  In a sermon commencing the month of Ramadan 2007, the Ayatollah Ali Khamenei accused the Bush administration of war crimes in Iraq, and of attempting to undermine Islam in the Middle East. Amidst chants from worshipers: “Death to America,” Khamenei stated that he has “a firm belief that one day this current US president and the American officials will be tried in a fair international court for the atrocities committed in Iraq.” 

The Ayatollah’s denunciation came just one day after President Bush’s demand that Iran and Syria put an end to their efforts to foil democratization in Iraq. The President’s remarks were based on the report from General Petraeus, indicating that Iran is fighting a “proxy war” in Iraq. In response, Khamenei compared president Bush to Hitler and Saddam Hussein (AFP, 2007).  

American popularity worldwide has plummeted over the 2003 invasion of Iraq and Khameinei’s word’s are falling upon a rising number of sympathetic ears. Any inclination the Bush administration has toward regime change in Iran should be given very, very careful thought. Ultimately, the situation confronting the United States regarding Iran is identical in many respects to the threat of terrorism itself: 

A clash of cultures, a stubborn battle of wills, two very different ways of looking at the same reality, a global game of chicken in which neither side wants to back down. This of course is a gross oversimplification of a very complex problem, but there are some basic truths to the argument. The United States and Europe are largely divided on their views of Iran, as well as their views of how best to counter terrorism. One of the greatest challenges facing the United States in its efforts to counter terrorism, is learning to understand those who resort to its use, and developing a coherent construct within which to address terrorism. The same can be said of Iran. And few can argue that there is no small amount of testosterone in the air, and this stubbornness can be seen on both sides of the standoff. Henry Kissinger has aptly stated that “so long as Iran views itself as a crusade rather than a nation, a common interest will not emerge from negotiations.” But this observation is equally applicable to the Bush administration as well.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Photoshop or not&#8230; While diplomacy with Iran may have its challenges, it should be pursued at every length. Iran has a conscription army and nearly 10 million eligible males between the ages of 18 and 32 (Posen, 2003).   Iran’s conventional military potential aside, US Intelligence assesses that Iran will likely have nuclear weapons capability within the decade (Select Committee on Intelligence, 2006). </p>
<p>The United States needs to be very aware of Iran’s growing political influence in the international community as well.  In a sermon commencing the month of Ramadan 2007, the Ayatollah Ali Khamenei accused the Bush administration of war crimes in Iraq, and of attempting to undermine Islam in the Middle East. Amidst chants from worshipers: “Death to America,” Khamenei stated that he has “a firm belief that one day this current US president and the American officials will be tried in a fair international court for the atrocities committed in Iraq.” </p>
<p>The Ayatollah’s denunciation came just one day after President Bush’s demand that Iran and Syria put an end to their efforts to foil democratization in Iraq. The President’s remarks were based on the report from General Petraeus, indicating that Iran is fighting a “proxy war” in Iraq. In response, Khamenei compared president Bush to Hitler and Saddam Hussein (AFP, 2007).  </p>
<p>American popularity worldwide has plummeted over the 2003 invasion of Iraq and Khameinei’s word’s are falling upon a rising number of sympathetic ears. Any inclination the Bush administration has toward regime change in Iran should be given very, very careful thought. Ultimately, the situation confronting the United States regarding Iran is identical in many respects to the threat of terrorism itself: </p>
<p>A clash of cultures, a stubborn battle of wills, two very different ways of looking at the same reality, a global game of chicken in which neither side wants to back down. This of course is a gross oversimplification of a very complex problem, but there are some basic truths to the argument. The United States and Europe are largely divided on their views of Iran, as well as their views of how best to counter terrorism. One of the greatest challenges facing the United States in its efforts to counter terrorism, is learning to understand those who resort to its use, and developing a coherent construct within which to address terrorism. The same can be said of Iran. And few can argue that there is no small amount of testosterone in the air, and this stubbornness can be seen on both sides of the standoff. Henry Kissinger has aptly stated that “so long as Iran views itself as a crusade rather than a nation, a common interest will not emerge from negotiations.” But this observation is equally applicable to the Bush administration as well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
