Attention Rich Pedophiles - Michael Jackson’s Neverland Ranch To Be Foreclosed, Sold at Auction

6 Responses for "Attention Rich Pedophiles - Michael Jackson’s Neverland Ranch To Be Foreclosed, Sold at Auction"

1. Joi February 27th, 2008 at 4:42 pm 1

   What a disgustingly hateful article. I don’t care all that much about Michael Jackson. I’m not trying to tell you want to write, but I work in the court system and had access to transcripts of that Jackson case in 2005. It was ludicrous and this article is rather ridiculous especially considering the people accusing him were proven to be lying in court. Sure there are pedos who deserve ridicule, but unfortunately for the writer of the article, Michael Jackson isn’t one of them.

2. Daniel Taylor February 27th, 2008 at 4:58 pm 2

   Its filed under comedy for a reason

3. TS February 27th, 2008 at 9:20 pm 3

   Comical or otherwise, sounds like you have now furnished Michael Jackon to have significant grounds for a new suit of libelous defamation - might even afford a couple more years payment on his property.

   Michael Jackson was found innocent - so keep your insulting jokes to yourself.

4. DuckButter February 28th, 2008 at 5:24 am 4

   A very amusing article. Yep, the pedo palace is soon to be no more. Hail Tom Sneddon!

   Btw, Jackson was not found innocent. He was found not guilty, meaning the jury didn’t find the evidence persuasive enough to convict - even though several jurors stated after the trial that they believed he was a child molester.

   Also btw, it’s not libelous to express one’s opinion.

   Back in the 1990s Jackson pled the Fifth Amendment when questioned about his relationships with young boys while testifying in a court case several former employees had filed against him. Chew on that one, Jackson fans. You understand what his pleading the Fifth meant? The same thing as the $25 million payout to one boy meant, and a $2 million payout to another, and a $1 million payout and new cars every year to another boy, and a recording contract to yet another boy and a job to that boy’s mother. Which is another reason why Jackson is now so short of cash. It’s mighty expensive keeping so many mouths shut.

5. TS February 28th, 2008 at 8:43 am 5

   DuckButter,

   Would you care to further express your ‘opinion’ regarding Jackson in this forum?

   I’d love to see Jackson crush all the fools whose typing skills exceed that of their mental capacity.

   Either way, that is my well educated opinion.

6. Joi March 2nd, 2008 at 4:51 pm 6

   He was found not guilty for a reason. There was no evidence and judging from the actual testimony, the fact that police sought over 100 search warrants in connection with the case and found nothing, the conflicting testimony between each family member, lies prosecutors told the judge in court (about “victims” that weren’t victims and ultimately testified for Jackson in court), this case was a big pile of nothing.

   The jury foreman was interviewed by Nancy Grace and flat out said he didn’t believe the accuser. Sometimes a ‘not guilty’ does mean ‘innocent’ when there is zero evidence.

   Also it is a total falsehood that Jackson plead the 5th for anything related to the 1993 case. I know. Our group’s senior project was based around the allegations; it wasn’t a case, per se because prosecutors didn’t charge Jackson with anything.

   There were now 1 million payouts to other children. That’s simply not true as evidenced by Jackson’s financial info which came out during the trial.

   As for those employees who filed the lawsuit, they lost that lawsuit and were ordered to pay Jackson’s legal fees to the tune of a million dollars. They were literally sued into bankruptcy by him, they would to have stolen from him by that jury as well and an additional finding was entered against them for theft and conversion of property. They don’t exactly have any incentive to tell the truth. Not to mention the actual people, the grown men, came to testify in Jackson’s defense.

   I know more than the average person about these cases because I was looking for proof and guilt and ran upon too much information I couldn’t ignore which pointed to his innocence.