Comments on: Roger Clemens Is Guilty: Get Over It http://blog.synthesis.net/2008/02/13/roger-clemens-is-guilty-get-over-it/ A music blog with a techy twist, twisted content, and other entertainment oddities viral and live from Northern California. Thu, 21 Aug 2008 22:25:51 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1 By: Kerry http://blog.synthesis.net/2008/02/13/roger-clemens-is-guilty-get-over-it/#comment-98534 Kerry Thu, 14 Feb 2008 06:50:27 +0000 http://blog.synthesis.net/2008/02/13/roger-clemens-is-guilty-get-over-it/#comment-98534 Roger Clemon's guilt is obvious to any logically minded person and it has nothing to do with believability or likability of either the accused or the accuser. His guilt is proven with the one simple act by his accuser of submitting blood tainted syringes to those investigating Roger Clemons. From that point on it is a simple exercise in logic. 1. If McNamee submitted said samples, he must know that those samples have traces of Roger Clemon's blood. 2. Those who contend that Roger's blood could have been smeared on syringes with traces or roids after the fact that were not actually injected in Roger at the time are missing the telling point. If McNamee had saved anything with Roger's blood it would have to have been related to steroids and not B12 or Lidocaine as intimated by Roger. There would have been no sane reason to keep samples of Roger's blood had he only been injecting B12 or Lidocaine because at that time he would never have had reason to think that he would want to frame his employer at some point in the future. Why would he possibly do something so illogical? And for something as harmless as B12 he would simply have disposed of the syringes at the time. 3. Only if investigators were able to determine that he had some kind of a blood fetish and had saved blood from every person he had ever injected, could a reasonable person begin to suspect that he was a possible nutcase. Or only if investigators were able to prove that McNamee had recently had access to Roger's blood could his action of turning in those syringes be cast in doubt. 3 And if it is not Roger's blood on the syringes unless he is a complete fool he would have to believe that Roger would immediately have offered his blood for DNA testing knowing that he had nothing to fear and that McNamee would be proven a liar. I rest my case. Roger Clemon’s guilt is obvious to any logically minded person and it has nothing to do with believability or likability of either the accused or the accuser. His guilt is proven with the one simple act by his accuser of submitting blood tainted syringes to those investigating Roger Clemons. From that point on it is a simple exercise in logic.

1. If McNamee submitted said samples, he must know that those samples have traces of Roger Clemon’s blood.

2. Those who contend that Roger’s blood could have been smeared on syringes with traces or roids after the fact that were not actually injected in Roger at the time are missing the telling point. If McNamee had saved anything with Roger’s blood it would have to have been related to steroids and not B12 or Lidocaine as intimated by Roger. There would have been no sane reason to keep samples of Roger’s blood had he only been injecting B12 or Lidocaine because at that time he would never have had reason to think that he would want to frame his employer at some point in the future. Why would he possibly do something so illogical? And for something as harmless as B12 he would simply have disposed of the syringes at the time.

3. Only if investigators were able to determine that he had some kind of a blood fetish and had saved blood from every person he had ever injected, could a reasonable person begin to suspect that he was a possible nutcase. Or only if investigators were able to prove that McNamee had recently had access to Roger’s blood could his action of turning in those syringes be cast in doubt.

3 And if it is not Roger’s blood on the syringes unless he is a complete fool he would have to believe that Roger would immediately have offered his blood for DNA testing knowing that he had nothing to fear and that McNamee would be proven a liar.

I rest my case.

]]>