13 Feb

Roger Clemens: World Series Champion, Cy Young winner, ageless wonder…Steroid Abuser. End of story.
The past month in major league baseball since the delivery of the Mitchell Report has seen more harumphs than Blazing Saddles. The Rocket, because of his elevated status in the statistical history of the game, has been at the eye of the storm. By now you are undoubtedly familiar with the story. Today saw five plus hours of Congressional testimony by former trainer Brian McNamee and Clemens both. Representatives jumped to the defense of both men at times, but also attacked, depending on their personal takes on the matter. Dan Burton, R-Indianapolis, vehemently defended Clemens, barraging McNamee like a school bully. But, despite Clemens making a more convincing witness than McNamee, who has admittedly made a handful of false statements, former teammate Andy Pettite has not backed down as to Clemens’ guilt. Pettite, as you may or may not know, was another major name listed in the Mitchell report, and has come clean about his use of steroids and Human Growth Hormone. He maintains that Clemens was a fellow abuser, despite their once inseparable friendship. And on top of all this, McNamee now alleges that he injected Clemens’ wife, Debbie, with HGH as well.
What a circus! Can any real good can come of these hearings? The answer: NO! Roger Clemens reputation has been permanently tarnished, and in my opinion, rightfully so. I don’t care if there is a lack of “physical evidence.” With the list of players named in the Mitchell report that have already come clean due to accusation, how does it figure that Clemens, who was detailed more than any other player, stands as some exception to guilt? Is it reasonable to assume that McNamee decided to make all of this up after players like Andy Pettite and Chuck Knoblauch, former teammates of Clemens, have already come clean to allegations? Yeah, that makes a lot of sense. I can just picture McNamee, Pettite and Knoblauch sitting around the fire in the den of a cozy log cabin, smoking big cigars and drinking brandy…
“Hey gang,” says Pettite. “Anybody up for incriminating ourselves and ruining our reputations?”
“Only if we can bring down the Rocket,” pipes in Knoblauch.
“Well,” starts McNamee, “than have I got a story for you..”
Yeah, I bet it went something like that. Then the three of them had a quick tumble in the hay and went sledding.
Roger Clemens is guilty folks. There’s nothing else to it. The world is not always the conspiratorial box of slime that lawyers might want us to believe.

One Response for "Roger Clemens Is Guilty: Get Over It"
Roger Clemon’s guilt is obvious to any logically minded person and it has nothing to do with believability or likability of either the accused or the accuser. His guilt is proven with the one simple act by his accuser of submitting blood tainted syringes to those investigating Roger Clemons. From that point on it is a simple exercise in logic.
1. If McNamee submitted said samples, he must know that those samples have traces of Roger Clemon’s blood.
2. Those who contend that Roger’s blood could have been smeared on syringes with traces or roids after the fact that were not actually injected in Roger at the time are missing the telling point. If McNamee had saved anything with Roger’s blood it would have to have been related to steroids and not B12 or Lidocaine as intimated by Roger. There would have been no sane reason to keep samples of Roger’s blood had he only been injecting B12 or Lidocaine because at that time he would never have had reason to think that he would want to frame his employer at some point in the future. Why would he possibly do something so illogical? And for something as harmless as B12 he would simply have disposed of the syringes at the time.
3. Only if investigators were able to determine that he had some kind of a blood fetish and had saved blood from every person he had ever injected, could a reasonable person begin to suspect that he was a possible nutcase. Or only if investigators were able to prove that McNamee had recently had access to Roger’s blood could his action of turning in those syringes be cast in doubt.
3 And if it is not Roger’s blood on the syringes unless he is a complete fool he would have to believe that Roger would immediately have offered his blood for DNA testing knowing that he had nothing to fear and that McNamee would be proven a liar.
I rest my case.
Leave a reply